I have
read William Apess’ An Indian’s
Looking-Glass for the White Man in a previous class and really quite enjoy
him. I really enjoyed reading this text for a second time a believe that I got
a little more out of it than when I read it the first time. I appreciate his
use of scripture, which he uses a lot of in this text because he was an
ordained minister.
I know
that not much is known about William Apess and what is known comes from his
autobiography A Son of the Forest. I
believe that he was born in a tribe somewhere in Massachusetts and also he ran
away when he was 15 and joined the militia in New York and fought in the War of
1812. He was ordained as a minister somewhere around 1830 and in the same year,
he published his autobiography.
There
are a few things I like and dislike about Apess’ An Indian’s Looking-Glass for the White Man. What I do like is, as
I said before, his use of scripture to back-up his argument. I also liked how h
was calling you out on your actions or the actions of the whites in his day.
What I didn’t like was that it felt way to much like an essay, because of the
format of it and felt too impersonal. I also didn’t really like that he asked
like 10 questions in every paragraph. The questions he asks are rhetorical, but
I believe he kind of over does it a little. I think the same can be said for
the amount of scripture he uses. He went a little overboard on it. However, it
does drive home his point of how the whites back then needed to man up and stop
being such hypocrites, so I can forgive him of that.
No comments:
Post a Comment