I did
not particularly like this story. It had too much testosterone in it for me,
probably because I’m a girl. Also, the ending was way weird. There’s a flood
and it takes away the house where the baby lives and then the town finds the
baby and the man who looks after I and the baby is dead and then Kentuck says “”he’s
a-taking me with him. Tell the boys I’ve got The Luck with me now” (1491). And then
dies. That’s just weird to me.
I don’t really understand the
setting of this story. I get that the town is filled with refugees and people
running from the law. The town is filled with only men and then suddenly there
is this woman who has a baby and dies during childbirth and the whole thing is
like a miracle to the men in this town. Even though the baby is an orphan, the whole
town seems to adopt him. The story seems really happy until the end where the
child dies, which to me seems really random.
I did like the part in the story
about the baby talking to the birds and how Mother Nature was “his nurse and
playfellow” (1490). That was a nice image. It reminds me of the good old days
in elementary school, where the neighborhood kids would get together, and play
kick ball or capture the flag outside. We would get dirty and have fun outside
in the sun. Mother Nature was our playfellow.
I wasn't a big fan of this story either. I agree that there was too much testosterone. It was interesting to me how quickly all the "ruffians" changed. The story seemed to be structured with the generic "tough guy turned good" act. However, the ending totally threw me off as well. I was not expecting the child to die. In fact, I was expecting the child to grow older and for the camp to continually thrive. Because the child dies, it leaves the question: will the camp continue to grow? Or will the men revert back to how they were? Either way, the child's death does seem random.
ReplyDelete