Reply to Sarah Hatton

I also love the quote you chose from Henry Thoreau’s Where I Lived, and What I Lived For. It is so poetic and describes life perfectly. I believe the line is saying that you live life but when you look at it, you can see the emptiness of life or the shallowness of it. We are all consumed by the technologies of this world and the societal norm and I do agree with you that Thoreau wants us to live outside the societal norm, but like you said, that just isn’t possible because the world is changing everyday and we must learn to adapt if we want to survive and make a name for ourselves in this world.

I also agree with you on how you said that Thoreau’s argument is that we need to step out of time and not let it define us. In part, I believe this is true. We shouldn’t let time consume us. However, I do agree with you that this philosophy is not realistic in today’s world because of the hectic life style we all have.

I think Thoreau is kind of living in his own fantasyland. Part of me thinks that he is writing this text as his “perfect world” scenario, but sooner or later you have to come back to reality and see and take the world for what it is.

Henry Thoreau's "Where I Lived, and What I Lived For"

I quite enjoyed Henry Thoreau’s “Where I Lived, and What I Lived For”. I was refreshing to just read a story about the farm he bought and not have this huge meaning to the story. Also, he didn’t use huge words to make himself look more educated. I hate when people use bug words to make themselves look smarter. First, I don’t really understand what they are saying so I don’t really care about what they are writing and second, it just makes them look like they are trying to look smart but aren’t really succeeding at it.

            I really enjoyed the scenery that Thoreau put into his writing. I could almost see the house in which he lived in. It was really interesting how he kept referencing different things that really did not have any relation to each other. He referenced a lot of Greek god things. For example, on page 888 he referenced Atlas, which is a Greek God, who was forced by Zeus to stand on the earth supporting the heavens on his head and in his hands, which was a punishment for creating war against the Olympian Gods. He also references constellations, such as the constellation of Cassiopeia’s Chair and Aquila. Also, he puts in a lot of things from Hinduism, like he uses a different name for Krishna, who is the eighth avatar or Vishnu in Hindu mythology.

            A lot of the stuff he references and compares things to I don’t really know about so at times it was a little hard to discern what he was trying to say, but overall it was a good text.

Common Sense by Thomas Paine

I really enjoyed reading this excerpt from “Common Sense” and rightfully titled so. After the introduction, Thomas Paine starts saying this is my argument and all I am stating are common facts. In the first paragraph of this section, he basically says “Sit down, shut up, and listen”, which I love. After that, it gets a little shaky or unclear what he is saying until about a page and a half in.

Thomas Paine starts talking about how some people believe we owe Britain something that they are our mother/father and we should thank them. Paine replies back in a tone that kind of says “you stupid idiots, and imbeciles. We owe nothing to Britain.” I love how he goes into that argument of if Britain was our parents then America is a fully grown man/woman and don’t need his/her parents anymore and that Britain should not interfere with America’s life, but then her reprimands this argument by saying that Britain is not our parent, because even though they settled here first there are people here from other countries. “Not one third of the inhabitants, even of this province (Pennsylvania) are of English decent”(p 329). Then he goes on to say, and you’ll love this, that if we are subject to England because some of us came from there, then you can also say that England is subject to France because William the Conqueror. “The first King of England of the present line (William the Conqueror) was a Frenchman, and half the peers of England are descendents from the same country; wherefore, by the same method of reasoning, England ought to be governed by France”(p 329). Thomas Paine blew my mind away with that, because most people do not think about England in that respect. Also, he said that the people that came over to the New World were fugitives and people being harassed and America is a safe house for them to be free. So all in all, that argument is copout.

Another argument he makes is that America should not have any relations with England because it is a monarchy and they are almost always at war. So when they are at war, we will have to come save their butts and then we would be in debt or our economy would decrease etc. It is the same with the whole trade argument.

That is basically the end of Paine’s argument, but then he goes on to say that if a person still believes America should be governed by England, then he has probably not lost a loved one in the war or if he has then he is “unworthy of the name of husband, father, friend, or lover, and whatever may be your rank or title in live, you have the heart of a coward, and a spirit of a sycophant (p 331) or according to Dictionary.com, a self-seeking, servile flatterer, fawning parasite, which makes me laugh a little.

I love the way he entitled this piece; “Common Sense”. It’s kind of a smack in the face. Paine’s almost saying that he shouldn’t have to spell this out to you but he is. He’s saying that the people of America should have the common sense to see that we should not be tied to Britain in anyway shape or form and that we should keep on fighting for America. “O! ye that love mankind! Ye that dare appose not only the tyranny but the tyrant, stand forth. Every spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted around the globe. Asia and Africa have long expelled her. Europe regards her like a stranger, and England hath given her warning to depart. O! receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind (p 332).

The Pennsylvania Gazette: March 31st, 1742 issue

            The issue was actually kind of hard to read, because I did not recognize a few words and the lettering or font was really sketchy and faded. In the text, they sometimes use these weird symbols that look more like f’s instead of s’s and I don’t know if that is a typo or if that is what they did in that time, but it’s really strange to read. Also, there are smudges on the newspaper, which indicate that it is old, that cover up words that had to decipher based on the sentence that it was in. Also, there was a weird symbol that stood in place of a c and almost looked more like an e. The spelling in this paper is very weird and grammar is not at all, what it is like today. The language is also very constitution like, if you get my drift. It’s very old and packed and frankly a little hard to understand.

            This issue is all about the succession of the Russian throne by Princess Elizabeth after the Emperor Peter II has died and has not claimed a successor. Then the issue also say that when and if the Princess Elizabeth dies, Prince John will succeed the throne. The issue goes on for a little bit on if so and so dies so and so will succeed the throne, which got a little boring. It’s like in the Bible those long paragraphs that say blah the son of blah who had blah who had a son blah and so on and so forth.

            After that long succession line, the issue talks about Prince Peter II marriage to the Princess Dolgorucky and also talks about certain people coming out from exile. Then the issue talked about the council and who was in it; the Prince of Hesse Homburgh, the Veldt Marshal Lascy, Princp Czerkasi, etc. All in all, there are 11 people in the council.

            When the story ends the issue looks like any other newspaper we have. There are ads. after and people trying to sell stuff. Also there are a few short like six line, very small stories. One is titled “To Be Left”, another is ”Whereas Elizabeth Dunlap.”

            Overall, the issue was pretty interesting. It was exciting to see an old newspaper and also how they wrote back then. Obviously, they did not have any grammar rules because Franklin's grammar really stunk. However, I did enjoy reading it and advise a lot of you that if you haven’t already, go try to find a really old newspaper and read it and find the differences and similarities between a really old issue and a brand new one.